Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Forcen v. Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest
as 1:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Arlene Forcen
Defendant:
Homesite Insurance Company of the Midwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01372
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Underwood v. 1450 SE Orient, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01366
Defendant:
Denise K. Concannon, Michael R. Munzing, Aligra Marie Rainy and others
Plaintiff:
Laura L. Underwood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Arcoren v. Lane County Jail et al
as 6:2017cv00715
Plaintiff:
Arlen Lee Arcoren, II
Defendant:
Lane County Jail and D. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Keefe Commissary Network, Ltd.
as 2:2016cv01530
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary Network, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Arlen P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
as 6:2015cv01565
Plaintiff:
Arlene Vasquez
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Myrick
as 2:2015cv00738
Respondent:
John Myrick
Petitioner:
Arlen Porter Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2014cv01853
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Dawn Arlene Lackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Mathison, Sr. v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00732
Defendant:
Arlen Ness Enterprises, Inc. and Polaris Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Mathison, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
