Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Williamson v. Connecticut Valley Arms
as 1:2022cv00877
Plaintiff:
David S Williamson and David S. Williamson
Defendant:
Connecticut Valley Arms, Inc. and Blackpowder Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
United States of America v. Firearm Mossberg 500A Shotgun CAL:12 SN:R165442; et al
as 4:2021cv12086
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Firearm Mossberg 500A Shotgun CAL:12 SN:R165442;, Firearm Winchester 94 Rifle CAL:44-40 SN:3301994M;, Firearm Rossi M92 Rifle CAL:45 SN:MA016537; and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
All About Chores LLC et al v. Lyon, in his official capacity only as Executive Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2018cv12000
Plaintiff:
Y-PCS Group Inc., Assisting You At Home LLC, American Care LLC and others
Defendant:
Nick Lyon, in his official capacity only as Executive Director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and RICHARD D. SNYDER
Intervenor Plaintiff:
One Love Home Care LLC, Adult Care Services LLC, Supreme Home Care Givers Agency, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
United States of America v. Ammunition Fifty-Two (52) Rounds, multi calibers et al
as 1:2017cv12693
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ammunition Fifty-Two (52) Rounds, multi calibers, Ammunition components Three Hundred Twenty-Nine (329) multi calibers, Firearm Mossberg Model 500C .20 gauge Shotgun, SN: K515276 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Classic Arms, Inc. v. Mendoza
as 1:2014cv01290
Plaintiff:
Classic Arms, Inc.
Defendant:
Benjamin S. Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Palatka et al v. Savage Arms, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00626
Plaintiff:
Rodney Palatka and Joanie Palatka
Defendant:
Savage Arms, Inc. and Savage Arms Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
