Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Ledbetter v. IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04157
Plaintiff: Rhonda Ledbetter
Defendant: IDN-Armstrong's, Inc. and IDN Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lincoln Property Company v. Adult International, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv03164
Plaintiff: Lincoln Property Company
Defendant: Adult International, Inc. and Gregory Armstrong-Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North American Specialty Insurance Company v. Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02836
Plaintiff: North American Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant: Carter Brothers Security Services, LLC, John F. Carter and Matthew G. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Pippen et al v. Fulton County, Georgia
as 1:2017cv00362
Plaintiff: Damarcus Pippen and William Armstrong, Jr.
Defendant: Fulton County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff: Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant: G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bankston v. Sewon America, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00207
Plaintiff: Craig Bankston
Defendant: Sewon America, Inc. and Chris Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Crawford v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv04005
Plaintiff: Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant: William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Armstrong
as 1:2015cv03301
Petitioner: Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Respondent: Bruce Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff: John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant: William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?