Cases 1 - 10 of 21
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, NURSE ARMSTRONG and NURSE ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Dooly State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Erik E. Pryor
Defendant:
Dooly State Prison, Ms. Armstrong and Ms. Altma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baskin v. Labott et al
as 1:2023cv03799
Plaintiff:
DeSean M. Baskin
Defendant:
Patrick Labott, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cobb County et al
as 1:2022cv04809
Plaintiff:
Jabril Sidney Jones and Jibril Sidney McGlowan
Defendant:
Cobb County, Magistrate Judge Charles Chesbro, Marty First and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banda v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv02677
Plaintiff:
Alick Ricky Banda
Defendant:
Randy Davis, D. Horton, Chief of Security H. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Schrader et al
as 1:2018cv02157
Plaintiff:
Thashaggi Ashley Chavis Brunson
Defendant:
Kathryn M. Schrader, Brandon Delfunt, Lou Solts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOWELL v. ALABAMA, STATE OF et al
as 4:2017cv00238
Plaintiff:
ANDY NOWELL
Defendant:
ALABAMA, STATE OF, COLUMBUS GEORGIA, JEREMY ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2017cv00319
Petitioner:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crawford v. Suddaby et al
as 1:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Lawrence L. Crawford
Defendant:
G. Suddaby, Tohenberg, William Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
