Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Roach et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv03410
Plaintiff:
Dina Roach, Evelina Cruz, Archil Lomidze and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, David Do, Chair of the NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkinson et al v. Desormeau et al
as 1:2022cv00851
Plaintiff:
Taron Parkinson, Michael Suber, Keith Garlin and others
Defendant:
Kevin Desormeau, Sasha Cordoba and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. The City of Rochester et al
as 6:2021cv06717
Plaintiff:
Joy Elizabeth Armstrong
Defendant:
City of Rochester, "John Doe Police Officers 1-200" (names and number of whom are unknown at present), Todd Baxter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv07542
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Armstrong v. B&H Photo et al
as 1:2019cv11676
Plaintiff:
Richard Armstrong
Defendant:
B&H Photo, David Eisenberg and Alan P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker et al v. Town Of Greenburgh et al
as 7:2019cv10576
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-10, M.T. Pacino, E.M. Olson and others
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Walker and Otte Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
