Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Forbes v. LaSalle County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv15298
Plaintiff:
James Forbes
Defendant:
LaSalle County Jail, Well Path, John Banda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokich v. Diss et al
as 1:2023cv14159
Plaintiff:
Michael D Stokich
Defendant:
Adam Diss, . Hill, . Cravatta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2021cv50253
Defendant:
Mr. Gross, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
De'Montray Larell Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ward v. Santo et al
as 3:2021cv50154
Defendant:
Mr. Gross, Mr. Armstrong, Mr. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
De'Montray Larell Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strawberry v. Mendrick et al
as 1:2020cv05948
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe 6, DuPage Health Care Unite and others
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton Strawberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. 4th Judicial Circuit Court of Cook County
as 1:2019cv04827
Defendant:
4th Judicial Circuit Court of Cook County
Plaintiff:
Craig Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reimann v. Templeton et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Jennifer "Doe", LaSalle Co. Sheriff Dept., "John" Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Reimann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrickson et al v. Metropolitan Correctional Center of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv04637
Defendant:
McCormick, Macdonald, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy B Fredrickson and Jason A Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv09215
Plaintiff:
Ian Charles Armstrong
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois, Thomas Dart, Toni Preckwinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv03327
Plaintiff:
Lamont Armstrong
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, John Doe(s) and Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
