Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Feldman et al v. Rite Aid Hdqtrs Corp. et al
as 5:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Arnold E. Feldman , Southwest Mississippi Anesthesia, P.A. and Southwest Mississippi Anesthesia, P.A., Inc.
Defendant:
Rite Aid Hdqtrs Corp., Walgreens Pharmacy , Mississippi CVS Pharmacy, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners v. Feldman
as 2:2014cv02744
Defendant:
Arnold E. Feldman
Plaintiff:
Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold Feldman, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 12-31038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD E. FELDMAN, Medical Doctor and SOUTHWEST MISSISSIPPI ANESTHESIA, P.A., INCORPORATED, doing business as The Feldman Institute
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, In her Official Capacity as Secretary/Director of Department of Health & Human Sevices, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES AND CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, MARILYN TAVENNER, In her Official Capacity as Administrator of CMS and others
Riess et al v. Metsun Two Baton Rouge LA Senior Living, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00280
Plaintiff:
Arnold E Feldman and Charlotte Riess
Defendant:
Metsun Two Baton Rouge LA Senior Living, LLC and Sunrise Senior Living Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Feldman et al v. The Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2012cv00246
Plaintiff:
Arnold E Feldman and Southwest Mississippi Anesthesia, P.A, Inc
Defendant:
Pinnacle Business Solutions, Inc., Kathleen Sebelius, Marilyn Tavenner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
First Choice Surgery Center of Baton Rouge, LLC et al v. United HealthCare Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00065
Plaintiff:
Arnold E. Feldman and First Choice Surgery Center of Baton Rouge, LLC
Defendant:
United HealthCare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
