Cases 11 - 20 of 53
The Mississippi Bar v. Sheppard
as 3:2023ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Felisha Anne Sheppard
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Patrick
as 3:2023ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Megan Mariah Patrick
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Brooks
as 3:2023ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Brandon LaRue Brooks
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
The Mississippi Bar v. Hammett
as 3:2023ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Mary Holly Hammett
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Smith
as 3:2022ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Latisha R. Smith
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Bey v. Jordan et al
as 3:2022cv00393
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Chief Judge Daniel P. Jordan, III, Judge Henry T. Wingate, Judge Carlton W. Reeves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 3:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 1:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Sims
as 3:2022ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Lanesha L. Sims
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
