Cases 11 - 20 of 46
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 1:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Mayers
as 3:2022ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Urura W. Mayers
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Sims
as 3:2022ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Lanesha L. Sims
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Yoder
as 3:2022ad00002
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
George M. Yoder, III
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Walker
as 3:2022ad00001
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Randolph Walker
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Stewart v. The Mississippi Bar
as 3:2021ad00006
Petitioner:
Peter A. C. Stewart, III
Respondent:
The Mississippi Bar
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Williamson
as 3:2021ad00005
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Candace L. Williamson
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Walter
as 3:2021ad00004
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
William C. Walter
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
The Mississippi Bar v. Miller
as 3:2021ad00003
Plaintiff:
The Mississippi Bar
Respondent:
Jonathan Adam Miller
Interested Party:
Arthur Johnston, Porfi Stokes, Patricia Green and others
Bey v. Jordan et al
as 3:2021cv00576
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Chief Judge Daniel P. Jordan, Judge F. Keith Ball, Clerk Arthur Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
