Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Reyes v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv50419
Defendant:
Arthur Manzano, Andrea Tack, Rob Jeffreys and others
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Reyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Manzano
as 3:2024cv50362
Defendant:
Lieutenant Arthur Manzano
Plaintiff:
Marshall King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50344
Defendant:
William Bruno, Mirella Susnjar, Jane Marinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daheya v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50328
Defendant:
Lt. Stevens, Bruno, Sgt Nailor and others
Plaintiff:
Saber Daheya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50190
Defendant:
Arthur Manzano, Jane Or John Doe and Andrea Tack
Plaintiff:
Marquis Saed Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown, Jr. v. Tack et al
as 3:2024cv50110
Plaintiff:
Allen Brown, Jr. and Blue
Defendant:
Andrea Tack, Wende, Billings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Nurse et al
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Steven C Hughes
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, Jane Doe, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50371
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Deputy Chief, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Robinson v. Jane Doe, et al
as 21-3229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES MOHAMED ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, Nurse, DIXON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, LARRY J. WILKS and others
Bernard v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2021cv50109
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Skrzypinsi, Joanna Kemmeren, Mrs. Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
