Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Tupac v. Asbury Automotive Group Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Mr. Michael David Tupac and Michael David Tupac
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group Inc, Asbury Arlington MB, LLC, Malcolm Russell Gage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Terrell v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Eli Terrell, Armando Aguilar, Michael Arroyo and others
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Westfall et al
as 5:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Sandra K. Westfall, Rhonda Janiece Long, Ronald Eugene Brown, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Asbury v. Avery et al
as 4:2021cv02534
Plaintiff:
Joel Asbury
Defendant:
Anthony Avery and Stan Koch & Sons Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Aguilar v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00467
Plaintiff:
Anyull Aguilar
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. and Rafael Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Laurel et al
as 7:2016cv00018
Plaintiff:
James Roberts
Defendant:
Alejandro R Laurel, Jeremy E Delago, Eric C Milbern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Laurel et al
as 7:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Roberts
Defendant:
Alejandro R Laurel, Jeremy E Delago, Eric C Milbern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asbury v. Southerland
as 3:2011cv00541
Plaintiff:
Lenora Asbury
Defendant:
Franklin J. Southerland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
