Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Whitfield v. Parmar
as 1:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Steven Whitfield
Defendant:
Dr. Ashok Parmar individually Doing business as Bakersfield Central Pain Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv05267
Plaintiff:
Ashok Singh
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas and Kenneth T. Cuccinelli
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Ashok Kumar et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv05993
Plaintiff:
Hazeltine Market, Ashok Kumar and Sonia Sood
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMEARICA and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
T Mobile US Inc. et al v. WCO Spectrum LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04347
Plaintiff:
T Mobile US, Inc., Clearwire Spectrum Holdings LLC, Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II LLC and others
Defendant:
WCO Spectrum LLC, SCH LLC, Academia Spectrum LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
