Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Nevada Chapter of the Associated General Contract, et al v. Marty Walsh
as 22-16544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEVADA CHAPTER OF THE ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC., ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS NEVADA CHAPTER and NEVADA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTY WALSH, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
Nevada Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc. et al v. Walsh
as 3:2021cv00430
Plaintiff:
Nevada Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America, Inc., Associated Builders and Contractors Nevada Chapter and Nevada Trucking Association
Defendant:
Marty Walsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Interpipe Contracting, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 17-55263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERPIPE CONTRACTING, INC.
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITEEE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Interpipe Contracting, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra, et al
as 17-55248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INTERPIPE CONTRACTING, INC. and ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATION COMMITEEE, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations and JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as California Labor Commissioner, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement
Associated Builders and Contractors of California Cooperation Committee, Inc. et al v. Harris et al
as 3:2016cv02247
Plaintiff:
Associated Builders and Contractors of California Cooperation Committee, Inc. and Interpipe Contracting, inc.
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Christine Baker and Julie Su
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151
Shortridge v. Foundation Construction Payroll Service, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv04850
Plaintiff:
Douglas Maurice Shortridge
Defendant:
Foundation Construction Payroll Service, LLC , Foundation Software, Inc. and Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs, et al v. Donna Norris, et al
as 12-55726
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHULA VISTA CITIZENS FOR JOBS AND FAIR COMPETITION, LORI KNEEBONE, LARRY BREITFELDER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DONNA NORRIS, MAYOR CHERYL COX, PAMELA BENSOUSSAN and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Idaho Building and Contruction, et al v. Lawrence Wasden
as 12-35051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDAHO BUILDING AND CONTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO and SOUTHWEST IDAHO BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellant:
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Amicu:
INLAND PACIFIC CHAPTER OF ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC. and NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION
Idaho Building and Contruction, et al v. Inland Pacific Chapter of Asso
as 11-35985
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IDAHO BUILDING AND CONTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO and SOUTHWEST IDAHO BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
INLAND PACIFIC CHAPTER OF ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE G. WASDEN, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Idaho Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO et al v. Wasden
as 1:2011cv00253
Plaintiff:
Idaho Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO and Southwest Idaho Building and Construction Trades Council, AFL-CIO
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden
Amicu:
Inland Pacific Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
