Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Association of Commuter Rail Employees Local No. 9 v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv05288
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF COMMUTER RAIL EMPLOYEES LOCAL NO. 9
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Association of Commuter Rail Employees Local No. 9 v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 1:2019cv08672
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF COMMUTER RAIL EMPLOYEES LOCAL NO. 9
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Sevin et al v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
as 1:2017cv10051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sevin , Peter Delvecchio and The Association of Commuter Rail Employees
Defendant:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Martino v. Metro North Commuter Railroad
as 14-279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Martino
Defendant - Appellee:
Metro North Commuter Railroad Company, Association of Commuter Rail Employees, Local Division 9 and Michael F. Doyle
Martino v. Metro North Commuter Railroad Company et al
as 3:2010cv01816
Plaintiff:
Michael Martino
Defendant:
Metro North Commuter Railroad Company, Association of Commuter Rail Employees and Michael F. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
DeFrancesco v. Bottalico et al
as 1:2010cv08193
Plaintiff:
Gina DeFrancesco
Defendant:
Anthony Bottalico, The Association of Commuter Rail Employees and MTA Metro-North Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Giglietti v. Bottalico et al
as 1:2010cv03652
Plaintiff:
Anthony Giglietti, Jr.
Defendant:
Anthony Bottalico , The Association of Commuter Rail Employees and MTA Metro-North Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cruise et al v. Doyle et al
as 1:2007cv03940
Plaintiff:
John L. Cruise, Jr., Brian Conrad, Kenneth J. Dibble and others
Defendant:
Michael J Doyle, Local Division 9, Locomotive Engineers and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
