Cases 1 - 10 of 16
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
O'Donnell v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv40158
Plaintiff:
Neil O'Donnell
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 1:2012cv12412
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., Aktiebolaget Hassle, Astrazeneca AB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv11883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bertrand et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 4:2010cv40039
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bertrand and James Bertrand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
as 4:2010cv40038
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Citizens for Consume, et al v. Abbott Laboratories,, et al
as 1:2001cv12257
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Consumer Justice , Colorado Progressive Coalition , Congress of California Seniors and others
Defendant:
Allergan Worldwide , Astrazeneca US , Bayer, AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Shirley Geller , United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midest Health Benefits Fund , Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. , Fujisawa Pharmaceut, Monsanto CO. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Roberta S. Starks , Kimberly K. Hoover , National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Amicu:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY a/k/a BRISTOL-MYERS ONCOLOGY DIVISION/HIV PRODUCTS , GENSIA SICOR, INC., Novartis AG and others
Movant:
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield , Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization, Inc., Neighborhood Health Plan, Inc. and others
Adr_provider:
Eric Green and Jonathan Marks
Respondent:
Luis E. Cobo
Objector:
Patricia Weatherly and James W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: State of Iowa Cases
as 1:2007cv12141
Plaintiff:
State of Iowa, State of Iowa, State of Iowa and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alpharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10959
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
The County of Orange v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10879
Plaintiff:
The County of Orange, The County of Orange and The County of Orange
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alcon Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
