Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
SMITH v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01526
Plaintiff: GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant: WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS, M. BLALOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Upton v. William Suter, et al
as 08-5215
Plaintiff - Appellant: David Upton
Defendant - Appellee: William K. Suter, Jeffrey Atkins and Erik Fossum
Juan Evans v. William Suter, et al
as 08-5212
Plaintiff - Appellant: Juan F. Evans
Defendant - Appellee: William K. Suter, United States Supreme Court, Danny Bickell and others
EVANS v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01042
Plaintiff: JUAN F. EVANS
Defendant: WILLIAM K. SUTER, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, DANNY BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UPTON v. SUTER et al
as 1:2008cv01039
Plaintiff: DAVID UPTON
Defendant: WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS and ERIK FOSSUM
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gene Smith, Sr. v. Supreme Court of the United St, et al
as 08-5171
Plaintiff - Appellant: Gene E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee: Supreme Court of the United States, William K. Suter, Clerk, Jeffrey Atkins, Clerk and others
SMITH v. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 1:2008cv00737
Plaintiff: GENE E. SMITH, SR.
Defendant: SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, JEFFREY ATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BRODY v. ATKINS et al
as 1:2007cv01899
Plaintiff: CLIFFORD L. BRODY
Defendant: RICHARD ATKINS, CYNTHIA SAMUELS, COBBLESTONE ASSOCIATES LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NORTON v. ATKINS et al
as 1:2007cv00529
Plaintiff: DWAYNE JAY NORTON
Defendant: JEFFREY ATKINS and RUTH JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELCH v. ATKINS et al
as 1:2007cv00057
Plaintiff: ELMORE WELCH
Defendant: JEFFREY ATKINS and ANN MCCAMEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?