Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lewis v. Atlanta USP
as 1:2022cv02474
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Deroy Lewis
Respondent:
Atlanta USP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baskakov v. Atlanta USP
as 1:2022cv01474
Plaintiff:
Grigorii Baskakov
Defendant:
Atlanta USP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curtis Smith v. Wood, et al
as 20-12918
Defendant / Appellee:
HILL, individually and in his official capacity as a Correctional Officer-Food Supervisor at USP-ATLANTA, WOOD, individually and in his official capacity as warden of the United States Pentientiary Atlanta ("USP ATLANTA"), DAWSON, individually and in his official capacity as Correctional officer at USP-ATLANTA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS LEE SMITH
Pate v. Warden of Atlanta USP Transfer Ctr.
as 1:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Frank Edwin Pate
Defendant:
Warden of Atlanta USP Transfer Ctr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Terry et al
as 1:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Jane Does, D.J. Harmon, Darlene Drew and others
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Stederick Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Warden of Atlanta, USP et al
as 1:2019cv00978
Defendant:
Warden of Atlanta, USP and Office of the Regional Director, Mr. Keller
Plaintiff:
James T. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Terry et al
as 1:2018cv01899
Plaintiff:
LaQuan Stederick Johnson
Defendant:
Elaine Terry, Darlene Drew, D. J. Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Fletcher et al
as 1:2017cv03004
Plaintiff:
Cydric Coleman
Defendant:
Fletcher, Johnson, R. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-15319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-10831
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
