Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Gilmore v. Hembrook
as 22-2963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gabriel Gilmore
Defendant / Appellee:
Brian Hembrook, C.O. Department of Corrections Attica Correctional Facility and D. Vail, C.O. Department of Corrections Attica Correctional Facility
Dorcil v. Warden, Attica Correctional Facility
as 1:2022cv04394
Petitioner:
Patrice Dorcil
Respondent:
Warden, Attica Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chin v. Noeth
as 22-1577
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wayne Chin
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Noeth, Superintendent Attica Correctional Facility
Chin v. Noeth
as 22-1398
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wayne Chin
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Noeth, Superintendent Attica Correctional Facility
Bazelais v. Rikers Island Correctional Center (D.O.C.) et al
as 1:2022cv03374
Plaintiff:
Wilner C. Bazelais
Defendant:
Rikers Island Correctional Center (D.O.C.) and Attica Correctional Facility (RICC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Encarnacion v. Noeth
as 22-719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bernabe Encarnacion
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph Noeth, Supt. of Attica Correctional Facility, Ensel, Lt.; Attica Correctional Facility, D.D. Shanahan, C.O.; Attica Correctional Facility and others
Cole v. Noeth
as 22-54
Petitioner / Appellant:
John W. Cole
Respondent / Appellee:
J. Noeth, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility
Chin v. Noeth
as 21-2044
Petitioner / Appellant:
Wayne Chin
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Noeth, Superintendent Attica Correctional Facility
Crosby v. Noeth
as 21-1185
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Noeth, Superintendent; Attica Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerry Crosby
Bellamy v. Annucci et al
as 1:2021cv01979
Defendant:
Susan Devlin-Varin, Downstate Correctional Facility, Dr. Hentschel and others
Plaintiff:
James Bellamy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
