Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Patelunas v. Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr. et al
as 3:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. Patelunas and Jerome J. Patelunas, II
Defendant:
Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr., Unknown Co-Conspirators-Luzerne County, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Acting By and Through Bucks County District Attorney Matthew Weintraub et al v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Acting By and Through Bucks County District Attorney Matthew Weintraub and Bucks County
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.), E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THE CHEMOURS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ESTATE OF JOHNSON v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2021cv04597
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, MARK COPOULOS doing business as BRUCHA HOLDINGS REALTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
BALLERING v. STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2020cv06332
Defendant:
STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL INSURANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF UTAH OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WASHINGTON OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT LYNN BALLERING
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR DOLLARS ($28,004.00) v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
TWENTY-EIGHT THOUSAND FOUR DOLLARS ($28,004.00)
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and OFFICE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
TWO (2) MOTOR VEHICLES v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
as 1:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
TWO (2) MOTOR VEHICLES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
