Cases 51 - 60 of 179,855
Navarrete v. Garland
as 24-2776
Petitioner:
JOSE GUADALUPE NAVARRETE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sanchez Chavez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2770
Petitioner:
CARLOS SANCHEZ CHAVEZ, BRISEIDA KRISTELLE LOPEZ DE LA TORRE, CARLOS EMMANUEL SANCHEZ LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Santana v. Garland
as 24-2756
Petitioner:
J. JESUS SUAREZ SANTANA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reyes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2762
Petitioner:
MICAELA JOSE REYES and ALIZ DAFNE JOSE REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Capi Esquivel v. Garland
as 24-2774
Petitioner:
ANGEL CAPI ESQUIVEL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Chowdhury v. Garland
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
JAHANGIR CHOWDHURY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Eubanks v. Hansell
as 24-1165
Plaintiff:
JAMAL EUBANKS, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jace Eubanks, deceased and J. E., an infant, by his father and natural guardian, Jamal Eubanks
Defendant:
DAVID HANSELL, former Commissioner, NEW YORK CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, JOHN AND JANE ROES, said names being fictitious and intended to represent individual attorneys, caseworkers, investigators, youth development specialists, members, agents, servants and/or employees of the New York City Administration for Children's S and others
Pearson v. City of New York
as 24-1167
Plaintiff:
LESTER PEARSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DARCEL CLARK, Bronx County District Attorney; In His Personal Capacity and others
Richardson v. Green
as 4:2024cv04079
Petitioner:
Jim L. Richardson
Respondent:
Brittany Green
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
