Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MARTIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY et al
as 3:2021cv00005
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Respondent:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
GARY ROBERT MARTIN
Alicea v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv02407
Plaintiff:
Tiffany A. Alicea
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and US Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLOWERS v. BERRYHILL
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
PAUL R. BLOWERS, JR.
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and CIVIL PROCESS CLERK
KESSLER v. BERRYHILL
as 2:2018cv00975
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, CIVIL PROCESS CLERK, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
KATASH L. KESSLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dibble v. Colvin et al
as 3:2014cv02501
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lee Dibble
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Walborn v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv00711
Plaintiff:
Richard Walborn
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and US Attorney's Office Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Markardt v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
Anne Pauline Markardt
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Amicu:
The Attorney General of the United States and US Attorney's Office Middle District of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Calvo v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00632
Plaintiff:
Joseph T. Calvo
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WEIMER v. ASTRUE et al
as 2:2011cv00434
Plaintiff:
RONALD GLENN WEIMER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL CHIEF COUNSEL, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Fitch v. United States Attorney et al
as 4:2008cv01007
Plaintiff:
James E. Fitch
Defendant:
United States Attorney, Social Security Administration and U.S. Attorney General
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
