Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01409
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Patel v. Warden et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Firoz Patel
Defendant:
Warden and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patel v. Warden et al
as 3:2022cv01190
Petitioner:
Firoz Patel
Respondent:
Warden and Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Amancio v. Deperry et al
as 3:2022cv00918
Plaintiff:
Sirley Amancio
Defendant:
Jeffery Deperry and Town of Old Saybrook
Intervenor:
Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Henderson v. Connecticut Leglislative Law Revision Commission et al
as 3:2020cv00058
Defendant:
Connecticut Supreme Court Justices, Chief Public Defender, State Sennate Members and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Roy Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Wardon et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Respondent:
Wardon and Attorney General
Petitioner:
Troy Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shakir v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01374
Respondent:
Attorney General and Commissioner of Corrections
Petitioner:
Anwar Shakir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shakir v. Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv00893
Petitioner:
Anwar Shakir, Sr.
Respondent:
Comm of Corrections and Attorney General
Defendant:
Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Comrs. of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01060
Petitioner:
Earl Thompson
Respondent:
Comrs. of Corrections and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perez v. Jepsen et al
as 3:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Ometrius Perez
Defendant:
George Jepsen, Office of the Attorney General and Matthew B. Beizer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
