Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Weeks v. Cain et al
as 4:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
L. C. Weeks, Jr.
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Attorney General State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bledsoe v. Lee County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2024cv00011
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bledsoe
Respondent:
Lee County Sheriff Dept., Capt. Partlow, Designee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruse v. Banks et al
as 4:2019cv00163
Petitioner:
Andrew C. Cruse, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Wendel Banks and Attorney General State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patrick v. Attorney General State of Mississippi
as 3:2016cv00922
Plaintiff:
Cadarrio Dewayne Patrick
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Mississippi and Marshall Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Flemming et al
as 3:2016cv00037
Plaintiff:
Earl Lewis Anderson, Jr.
Defendant:
Maurice Flemming, Eddie Edison, Faben Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Barra v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Marvin Barra
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Wesley et al
as 4:2013cv00155
Petitioner:
Charles Brown
Respondent:
Gloria Wesley and Attorney General State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Latney v. Bailey et al
as 4:2010cv00208
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Latney
Defendant:
Robert Bailey and Attorney General State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2010cv00207
Plaintiff:
Antshawn Davis
Defendant:
Attorney General State of Mississippi and E.J. (Bilbo) Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edmonson v. Dale et al
as 3:2010cv00103
Plaintiff:
Kenny Franklin Edmonson
Defendant:
Josh Dale, Leon Williams, Lou A. HIcks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
