Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv12207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al-Qararaa et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv12194
Plaintiff:
Anas Al-Qararaa and Amanda Marie Miller
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, United States Citizenship and Immigration Service, Ur M Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv11080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
1800 Michigan Avenue et al v. Small Business Administration of the United States et al
as 2:2022cv10377
Plaintiff:
1800 Michigan Avenue, 240 W 9 Mile LLC and 200 W Michigan Avenue
Defendant:
Small Business Administration of the United States, Isabella Casillas Guzman, Attorney General of the Eastern District of Michigan and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv12075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv12651
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv11837
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Zureki v. Nichols et al
as 2:2019cv12385
Defendant:
Doug Chaffin, Shawn Kotch, James Stewart, aka James Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Zureki
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
