Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Neuman v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2010cv00594
Plaintiff:
James Neuman
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Illinois Attorney General Office, Sangamon County Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Walls v. Illinois Department of Correct
as 08-3061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM WALLS
Defendant - Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS, in the special evaluation unit, RICHARD A. DEVINE, of Cook County States Attorney Office, ANITA ALVAREZ, of Cook County States Attorney Office and others
Kashula v. Illinois Department of Corrections Parole Department et al
as 3:2008cv00413
Petitioner:
David Michael Kashula
Respondent:
Illinois Department of Corrections Parole Department and Illinois Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Neuman v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2008cv01009
Plaintiff:
James Neuman
Defendant:
State of Illinois, City of Peoria, County of Peoria, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Walker et al
as 3:2007cv00811
Plaintiff:
Jason Williams
Defendant:
Roger E Walker, Jr , Alan Uctman , Al Martin and others
Movant:
Illinois Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: O
Watson v. The Home Depot USA Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv04191
Plaintiff:
Kellie R Watson
Defendant:
The Home Depot USA Inc., State of Illinois, Govenor Blagojevich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Neuman v. United States Government et al
as 3:2007cv00362
Plaintiff:
James Neuman
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Illinois, City of Peoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Neuman v. United States Government et al
as 1:2007cv01107
Plaintiff:
James Neuman
Defendant:
United States Government, State of Illinois, City of Peoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
