Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Fedder v. Delaware Attorney Generals Office
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Fedder
Defendant:
Delaware Attorney Generals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Newman v. Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2021cv01732
Plaintiff:
Shantell D. Newman
Defendant:
Attorney General Office, Newport PD and Cities Insurance Company Association of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maddox v. Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2019cv00914
Defendant:
Nicole Parton, Angela Garnsey, Allen Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Leo R. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Lewis v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2018cv00934
Petitioner:
Richard Lewis
Respondent:
State Of Delaware and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00857
Petitioner:
Edward Clark
Respondent:
Robert M. Coupe, Alan Grinstead and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rust v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00858
Petitioner:
Rodger Rust
Respondent:
Robert M. Coupe, Alan Grinstead and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bethard v. Coupe et al
as 1:2016cv00835
Petitioner:
Michael Bethard
Respondent:
Robert M. Coupe, Steven Wesley and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pinkston v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00269
Petitioner:
Jesus L. Pinkston
Respondent:
David Pierce and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Wesley et al
as 1:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
Michael A. Williams
Respondent:
Steven Wesley and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. Phelps et al
as 1:2013cv00465
Petitioner:
Leroy Cook
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Attorney General Office of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
