Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Taylor v. Crisham et al
as 2:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
Aubrey V Taylor and Uno
Defendant:
Catherine Crisham, Sara Blond and Lovisa Dvorak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01116
Petitioner:
Aubrey Taylor
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Starkgraf v. Inslee et al
as 3:2023cv05487
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Melissa A Hemstreet, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. Lyons et al
as 3:2023cv05497
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf and Kris
Defendant:
Samantha Lyons, Melissa A Hemstreet, Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv05770
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Aubrey M Eddington
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00999
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Aubrey Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taylor v. Tung
as 2:2019cv00234
Plaintiff:
Aubrey V Taylor
Defendant:
Eric Tung, Sara Blond, Kent Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
Maureen Hay , Igor Smal , Hanna Smal and others
Defendant:
American Safety Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hay et al v. American Safety Indemnity Company
as 3:2017cv05077
Plaintiff:
Maureen Hay , Igor Smal , Hanna Smal and others
Defendant:
American Safety Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Elzen et al v. Trend Capital Holdings, Inc.
as 3:2016cv05759
Plaintiff:
Dave Van Elzen and Aubrey Moore
Defendant:
Trend Capital Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
