Cases 1 - 10 of 40
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wilhy Harpo-Brown v. Director, Richmond County Board of Elections, et al
as 24-10078
Plaintiff:
WILHY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RICHMOND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and AUGUSTA-RICHMOND COUNTY COMMISSION
Mayes et al v. Augusta-Richmond County Government et al
as 1:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Sonya Alicia Mayes, Ja'Quez Paschal, Ja'Vontae Coleman and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County Government, Richmond County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Richard Roundtree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Smith
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia, Richard Roundtree, Deputy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harpo-Brown v. Bailey et al
as 1:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Augusta Richmond County Commission, Richmond County Board of Elections and Lynn Bailey
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
