Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mitchell et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00609
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
George Mitchell, Robert Hendren, Ralph Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Augustus et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02595
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Don Augustus and Mary Augustus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bleichert et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03380
Plaintiff:
Huan Xiong Liu, Maria Camacho, Angelina Berrios and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, Tyco Fire Products LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McFerren et al v. BAIC Inc et al
as 6:2018cv01298
Plaintiff:
Charlotte McFerren , Billy Lee Green , Augustus Bostick, Jr and others
Defendant:
BAIC Inc, VFG Inc, SoBell Ridge Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Lane v. USA
as 6:2016cv02005
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leroy Augustus Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thomas v. USA
as 4:2016cv01702
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Augustus Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lane v. USA
as 6:2014cv00943
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leroy Augustus Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Harbin et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2013cv01973
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harbin, Augustus McBeth, Robert Hutto and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , William R Byars, Jr , John H Carmichael, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lane v. USA
as 6:2009cv70037
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leroy Augustus Lane
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thomas v. USA
as 4:2007cv70063
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Anthony Augustus Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
