Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Daniel Dydzak v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 12-57106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 2:2012cv08759
Defendant:
1ST CENTURY BANCSHARES, INC., 1ST CENTURY BANK, MICHAEL BRUCE ABELSON and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Daniel Dydzak v. Joann Remke, et al
as 10-56000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK, AKA Daniel David Dydzak
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANN M. REMKE, DONALD F. MILES, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Daniel Dydzak v. Joann Remke, et al
as 10-55772
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK, AKA Daniel David Dydzak
Defendant - Appellee:
JOANN M. REMKE, DONALD F. MILES, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Daniel David Dydzak v. Joann M. Remke et al
as 2:2010cv01297
Defendant:
Lucy Armendariz, Board of Governors of the State Bar of California, Judge Audrey B. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Daniel David Dydzak v. Joann M. Remke et al
as 2:2010cv00828
Defendant:
Lucy Armendariz, Board of Governors of the State Bar of California, Michelle Cramton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Dydzak
Daniel Dydzak v. State of California, et al
as 09-56325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL D. DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, THE FOUNDATION OF THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Daniel D. Dydzak v. State of California et al
as 2:2008cv07765
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
State of California, The State Bar of California, The Foundation of the State Bar of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
