Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 3:2013cv03218
Plaintiff: Livell Figgs
Defendant: Alex Dawson , Austin S Randolph, Jr , Lori Fishel and others
Respondent: John Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Figgs et al v. Dawson et al
as 1:2013cv00094
Plaintiff: Livell Figgs
Defendant: Alex Dawson, Austin S. Randolph, Jr., Lori Fishel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Randolph et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv07774
Petitioner: Patrick Turner
Respondent: Austin S. Randolph, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawkins v. Randolph
as 3:2009cv03317
Plaintiff: Mario D Hawkins
Defendant: Austin S Randolph, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv03214
Plaintiff: Mark Williams
Defendant: Illinois Department of Corrections, John Doe, Director, Logan Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Elyea et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01076
Plaintiff: Sullivan Washington
Defendant: Willard Elyea, Cynthia Holbrook, Kevin Gilson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Turner v. Randolph
as 1:2008cv03551
Petitioner: Patrick Turner
Respondent: Austin S. Randolph, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Willis v. Randolph et al
as 1:2008cv02144
Petitioner: Anthony Willis
Respondent: Austin S. Randolph, Jr. and Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gill v. Randolph
as 2:2007cv02199
Petitioner: Martines Gill
Respondent: Austin S Randolph, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sturgeon v. Randolph
as 3:2007cv03127
Petitioner: Ronald W Sturgeon
Respondent: Austin S Randolph, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?