Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BHPH Capital LLC v. KUT Auto Finance LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
BHPH Capital LLC
Defendant:
KUT Auto Finance LLC and Nathaniel Syme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Federal Trade Commission v. Tate's Auto Center of Winslow Incorporation et al
as 3:2018cv08176
Defendant:
Tates Automotive Incorporation, Tate Ford Lincoln Mercury Incorporated, Tate's Auto Center of Winslow Incorporation and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Intervenor:
Capital One Auto Finance Incorporated and Santander Consumer USA Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Dorr et al v. Capital One Auto Finance Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02075
Defendant:
Camping Companies Incorporated, Capital One Auto Finance Incorporated and Capital One Auto Finance
Plaintiff:
Courtney Dorr and Sean Dorr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
