Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00752
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. AutoZone Development Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv07308
Defendant:
AutoZone Development Corporation, Autozone Stores, Inc. and Autozone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary L Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Davis v. AutoZone Development Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv09495
Petitioner:
Mary L Davis
Respondent:
AutoZone Development Corporation , Autozone, Inc. and Autozone Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stays v. Autozone Development Corporation
as 2:2014cv06171
Defendant:
Autozone Development Corporation
Plaintiff:
Autozone Northeast Inc. and Frank Stays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02252
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5185
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Batts et al v. Autozone Development Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv00517
Plaintiff:
Jean Batts and Bill Batts
Defendant:
Autozone Development Corporation, Autozoners, LLC, Autozone Texas, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
