Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BARRERA ALMONTE et al v. FEDEX CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv03224
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL BARRERA ALMONTE, MAYRA MAGADAN MUNOZ, JAMES JACKMAN and others
Defendant:
FEDEX CORPORATION, AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC,, HOLMAN FLEET LEASING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv15128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC. v. BAMA COMMERCIAL LEASING LLC.
as 1:2017cv03877
Plaintiff:
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
BAMA COMMERCIAL LEASING LLC. and AUTO TRAKK LLC.
Cross_claimant:
AUTO TRAKK LLC.
Cross_defendant:
BAMA COMMERCIAL LEASING LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAMINSKI v. AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv05625
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER KAMINSKI
Defendant:
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv03613
Plaintiff:
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANDREW LUDLAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC. et al v. KEITH HUBER, INC.
as 1:2009cv06186
Plaintiff:
AUTOMOTIVE RENTALS, INC., SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP. and HYDROCARBON RECOVERY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
KEITH HUBER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
