Cases 1 - 5 of 5
USA, et al v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., et al
as 11-15383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, On behalf of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the Central Valley Region
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee:
RHONE-POULNEC BASIC CHEMICALS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
IRON MOUNTAIN MINES, INC. and T. W. ARMAN
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC.'S, FKA Aventis CropScience USA, Inc.
USA, et al v. Iron Mountain Mines, et al
as 2:1991cv00768
Plaintiff:
USA and State of California
Cross_claimant:
Rhone-Poulnec Basic Chemicals Company and Rhone-Poulenc Inc
Cross_defendant:
Iron Mountain Mines , T. W. Arman and USA
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc fka Aventis CropScience USA Inc
Claimant:
Bayer CropScience, Inc fka Aventis CropScience USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
USA, et al v. T.W. Arman, et al
as 09-17411
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Appellant:
WILLIAM A. LOGAN, Jr. and LOGAN & GILES LLP
Defendant:
IRON MOUNTAIN MINES, RHONE-POULNEC BASIC CHEMICALS COMPANY and BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC., FKA Aventis CropScience USA, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
T. W. ARMAN
SPPI-Somersville, Inc. et al v. TRC Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2004cv02648
Defendant:
City of Antioch, United States Air Force, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
SPPI-Somersville, Inc., Somersville-Gentry Inc. and West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
West Coast Home Builders, Inc. v. Aventis Cropscience USA Inc. et al
as 3:2004cv02225
Defendant:
E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, General Motors Corporation, USX Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
West Coast Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
