Cases 1 - 10 of 32
AVILA-GAMEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv02614
Petitioner:
WILMER AVILA-GAMEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SMITH v. HUDSON COUNTY JAIL & REHABILITATION CENTER et al
as 2:2022cv04258
Plaintiff:
JOHN SMITH
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY JAIL & REHABILITATION CENTER, OSCAR AVILAS, JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Howard R. Young Correctional Institute et al
as 1:2021cv01556
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Johan Avila
Defendant:
Howard R. Young Correctional Institute and Centurion Forensic Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITING v. SERGEANT LIBERTY et al
as 1:2021cv08282
Defendant:
OFFICER REED, OFFICER XAYAPHACHAN, OFFICER TRAN and others
Plaintiff:
ADELBERT A. WHITING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. USA
as 1:2019cv02071
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jose G. Avila
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
AVILA v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2018cv09422
Petitioner:
ABDIEL F. AVILA
Respondent:
STEVE JOHNSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ARAIZA-AVILA v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2016cv04003
Petitioner:
JESUS A. ARAIZA-AVILA
Respondent:
THE WARDEN OF NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Avila v. Ott et al
as 3:2014cv02119
Plaintiff:
Jaime Avila
Defendant:
Michael Ott and Jeffrey Yoccum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. Correct Care Solutions
as 1:2013cv02011
Plaintiff:
Christian Avila
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions
Respondent:
David Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jorge v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01589
Plaintiff:
Avila J. Jorge
Defendant:
United States of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
