Cases 31 - 40 of 277
Avila v. Reynolds
as 1:2022cv00046
Petitioner:
Guillermo Suarez Avila
Respondent:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Avila v. Reynolds
as 6:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Guillermo Suarez Avila
Respondent:
Sheriff Mark Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Avila v. Hays County Jail
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Suarez Avila
Defendant:
Hays County Jail and Hays County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avila v. Hays County Jail
as 6:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Suarez Avila
Defendant:
Hays County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meza v. Los Generales Construction LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Ramon Julio Meza
Defendant:
Los Generales Construction LLC, Alfonso Cavazos, Maria Delcarmen Cortes Avila and others
Avila v. Lowes Companies Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv01386
Plaintiff:
Ralph Avila
Defendant:
Lowes Companies, Inc. doing business as Lowes Home Improvement, Lowes Companies Inc doing business as Lowes Home Improvement and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Avila et al
as 3:2021cv02184
Defendant:
Rudy Avila, CIG Internacional Sociedad Anonima, Trading Technologies Group Sociedad Anonima and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25
Martinez v. Aurelio Pedraza Avila et al
as 5:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Antonia Martinez
Defendant:
Aurelio Pedraza Avila d/b/a Transporte Internacional Laredo and Javier Lopez Salazar
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avila v. Lloyds et al
as 7:2021cv00257
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Avila
Defendant:
Jacob Mickler and Allstate Texas Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
