Cases 11 - 20 of 147
Benjamin Wright v. Sandy McCain, Warden
as 16-30874
Petitioner - Appellant:
BENJAMIN F. WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Robert Letell v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 16-30797
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LETELL
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES LEBLANC and SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Johnny Cannon v. Sandy McCain, Warden
as 16-30778
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHNNY CANNON
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Kimball v. Avoyelles Correctional Center et al
as 1:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Henry Kimball
Defendant:
Staff Avoyelles Correctional Center, Scott, Donna Grodner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Spellman v. Nathan Cain, II, Warden
as 16-30338
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN E. SPELLMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Fard Dickerson v. Riverbend Detention Center
as 16-30211
Petitioner - Appellant:
FARD A. R. DICKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Easom v. Cain et al
as 5:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Easom
Defendant:
Nathan B Cain, II and Avoyelles Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Benjamin Wright v. Nathan Cain, II, Warden
as 16-30134
Petitioner - Appellee:
BENJAMIN F. WRIGHT
Respondent - Appellant:
NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Smith v. Cain et al
as 3:2016cv00035
Respondent:
Avoyelles Correctional Center, Nate Cain and Jeff Landry
Petitioner:
Wendell Tyrone Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Runnels v. Nathan Cain, II, Warden
as 15-31097
Petitioner - Appellant:
DONALD RUNNELS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHAN B. CAIN, II, WARDEN, AVOYELLES CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
