Cases 1 - 10 of 1,509
Rogers v. Schwarz et al
as 2:2024cv02431
Plaintiff:
Harrison Rogers
Defendant:
Unknown Schwarz, Kirt Finley, Jonathan Venegas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Thomas v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00451
Respondent:
B Hudson
Petitioner:
Corey J Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Torres v. Associated Finishes Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv02401
Defendant:
Pamala J Burgin, Christine Burgin, Blaine B Burgin, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Chavez Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wall v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00436
Petitioner:
Dustin Alan Wall
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tinlin v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00425
Petitioner:
Andrew Dwayne Tinlin
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chappell v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02155
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated, Bard Access Systems Incorporated, Becton Dickinson and Company and others
Plaintiff:
Alan B Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ndayishimiye v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B Garland, Ted H Kim and others
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ndayishimiye
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cherry v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00408
Respondent:
B Hudson
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Cherry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rogers v. Hudson
as 4:2024cv00409
Petitioner:
Eric Rogers
Respondent:
B Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02016
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
