Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JOHNSON v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
LARRY B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
COLIN B. JOHNSON, ELIOT L. JOHNSON and AMERICAN CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
LEWIS et al v. PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv01328
Plaintiff:
ROGER JOSEPH WILLIS, ELY CHEN, GEORGE J. BARR and others
Defendant:
ESTATE OF NICHOLAS L. AMABILE, ESTATE OF DANIEL H. COURTNEY, ESTATE OF LAWRENCE D. OLBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
CHAMBERLAIN et al v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS GENERAL PENSION PLAN et al
as 1:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
MELVIN CHAMBERLAIN , JOHN PAXIN , ALBIN WATSON and others
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS GENERAL PENSION PLAN, MICHAEL FANNING, RODGER KAMINSKA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HAINES et al v. GENERAL PENSION PLAN OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2012cv01870
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HAINES , DOROTHY LOUVEN and KIM SPEARMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL PENSION PLAN OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, CHRISTOPHER J. HANLEY, RODGER KAMINSKA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
KRUG v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2008cv00891
Plaintiff:
GREGORY CHARLES KRUG
Defendant:
JOHN PAUL STEVENS and GAIL B. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
