Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Allen v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Columbus Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
G. Matteson, Y. Hill, M. Dernoncourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Sabraw et al
as 3:2021cv00395
Defendant:
Judge Barbara L. Major, Judge Dana M. Sabraw, Judge Cathy Ann Bencievengo and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bonilla v. Anello et al
as 3:2020cv00111
Defendant:
John A. Houston, Michael M. Anello, Cathy A. Bencivenco and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(HC) Brooks v. Fox
as 2:2019cv00879
Petitioner:
Harold B Brooks and Harold B. Brooks
Respondent:
R. Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bonilla v. Battaglia et al
as 3:2019cv00332
Defendant:
Ruben B. Brooks, Gonzalez P. Curiel, Conspiracy Members Jone Doe 1-500 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Brooks
as 3:2016cv06418
Petitioner:
Harold B. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton W. Marshall et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv06794
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Bedingfield, Mark A. Caylor, Michael Hardesty and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip B. Brooks, Manuel A Gonzalez, Thomas W Hall and others
Brooks v. Singh
as 2:2012cv00995
Petitioner:
Harold B Brooks
Respondent:
V. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Juan M Achan et al v. Los Angeles City of et al
as 2:2004cv04334
Plaintiff:
Juan M Achan, Daniel P Ackley, Stephen R Addleman and others
Defendant:
Defendant City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Lino Felipe Hernandez v. B. Brooks et al
as 2:2009cv02071
Plaintiff:
Lino Felipe Hernandez
Defendant:
B. Brooks, B. Brooks, S. H. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
