Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Pinto-Rios v. Arapahoe County et al
as 1:2020cv03698
Defendant:
C R, C W, Kerry Pruett and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pinto-Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
exocad GmbH v. B&D Dental et al
as 2:2017cv01252
Plaintiff:
exocad GmbH
Defendant:
B&D Dental and Daniel Jung
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
B&D Dental v. International Dental Solution
as 2:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
B&D Dental
Defendant:
International Dental Solution
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. B & D, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01524
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Songs of Universal, Inc. , Welsh Witch Music and others
Defendant:
B & D, LLC, Debra A. Dolph and Brent Campbell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
B&D Dental v. KOD Co
as 2:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
B&D Dental
Defendant:
KOD Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Compa Industries, Inc v. Trillacorpe Construction LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00894
Plaintiff:
Compa Industries, Inc
Defendant:
Trillacorpe Construction LLC , B&D Industries, Inc. and Westchester Fire Insurance Company
Cross_claimant:
Trillacorpe Construction LLC
Cross_defendant:
B&D Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
B&D Investments v. Zus Health et al
as 2:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
B&D Investments
Defendant:
Zus Health, Gavin Dickson and Bradley C. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandt et al v. b d Systems, Inc., et al
as 1:2007cv01960
Plaintiff:
Josiah Brandt and James M. Douglas
Defendant:
b d Systems, Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
