Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sylvester B Hill v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv02503
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Sylvester B Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Bartel et al v. Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dustin Bartel , Pamela Ahlberg , Christopher Alba and others
Defendant:
Tokyo Electric Power Company, Inc. and General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Hubbard et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leang Jones
Defendant:
Sue Hubbard, M. S. Evans, G. A. Neotti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAfee v. Curry et al
as 3:2009cv02497
Plaintiff:
Thurston B. McAfee
Defendant:
B. Curry, M. Callie, A. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Hill v. Tate et al
as 1:2007cv01866
Plaintiff:
Raynard B. Hill
Defendant:
Harold Tate, M. Winn, J. McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wrigley et al
as 1:2007cv01254
Defendant:
McBride, Sy, Jeff Wrigley and others
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hill v. The State of California
as 3:2007cv03170
Petitioner:
Tharon B. Hill
Respondent:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Chudy et al
as 3:2007cv03165
Plaintiff:
Raynard B. Hill
Defendant:
Joseph Chudy and Harold Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wrigley, et al.
as 1:2007cv00581
Plaintiff:
Eric B. Hill
Defendant:
Jeff Wrigley, Raylean Daugherty, D Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
