Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Shehadeh v. Ives et al
as 2:2022at00012
Petitioner:
Jamal Shehadeh
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Eli Sandoval v. Mary Mitchell, et al
as 18-35536
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELI SANDOVAL
Respondent - Appellee:
MARY MITCHELL, Western Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and RICHARD B. IVES, Warden
George Beltran v. USA, et al
as 18-35313
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE ALBERTO BELTRAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL SATELLITE PRISON CAMP AT SHERIDAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00614
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00505
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00478
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01975
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01876
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aaron Dante Moreno v. Richard B. Ives
as 2:2017cv08497
Respondent:
Richard B. Ives
Petitioner:
Aaron Dante Moreno
Marshall Richmond v. Richard Ives, et al
as 17-35746
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD B. IVES, Warden, BRYAN MARTINEK, KEVIN STRAIGHT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
