Cases 1 - 10 of 37
(HC) Papazian v. Trate
as 1:2024cv00851
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Petitioner:
James Michael Papazian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Hill v. Trate et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Officer R. Paulus, Warden B. M. Trate and Officer Barns
Plaintiff:
Thomas Austin Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
(HC) Trevino v. Trate
as 1:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Oscar Trevino
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Jackson-Bey v. Trate et al
as 1:2023cv01510
Petitioner:
Taariq Kaaleeq Jackson-Bey
Respondent:
B. M. Trate and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Roman v. Trate
as 1:2023cv01411
Petitioner:
Justin Roman
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00988
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(HC) Maldonado v. Trate et al
as 1:2023cv00993
Petitioner:
Robert Maldonado
Respondent:
Warden B. M. Trate and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Robledo v. Trate et al
as 1:2023cv00995
Petitioner:
Bryan Robledo
Respondent:
Warden B.M. Trate, United States of America and B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Rodriguez v. Trate, et al.
as 1:2023cv01008
Petitioner:
Edgardo Rodriguez
Defendant:
B. M. Trate and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Castro v. Trate, et al.
as 1:2023cv00982
Petitioner:
Salvador Castro
Defendant:
B M Trate, United States of America and B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
