Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Keith Carter v. California Correctional Instit, et al
as 21-16631
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH REAGAN CARTER
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, J. SULLIVAN, Warden, L. LUNDY and others
(PC) Carter v. California Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2019cv00358
Defendant:
T. Gonzalez, California Correctional Institution, B. Mello and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Reagan Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. Bueno et al
as 1:2018cv00075
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Locke
Defendant:
J. Bueno, D. Stebbins, B. Mello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent Solomon v. M. Carrasco, et al
as 13-15901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT U. SOLOMON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. CARRASCO, J. HEIL, C. TURNER and others
Anthony Evans v. Gonzalez, et al
as 11-17248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
GONZALEZ, Warden, T. W. STEADMAN, Associate Warden, L. PHILLIPS, Correctional Counselor - I and others
Solomon v. Carrasco et al
as 1:2011cv01511
Plaintiff:
Vincente Solomon
Defendant:
M. Carrasco, J Heil, C. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon v. Carrasco et al
as 2:2011cv02319
Plaintiff:
Vincente Solomon
Defendant:
M. Carrasco, J Heil, C. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Evans v. Gonzalez, et al
as 11-16385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY RAY EVANS
Defendant - Appellee:
GONZALEZ, Warden, T. W. STEADMAN, Associate Warden, L. PHILLIPS, Correctional Counselor - I and others
TEDDY-LAWRENCE v. STATE OF MICHIGAN INC., et al
as 1:2010cv01786
Plaintiff:
TEDDY-LAWRENCE
Defendant:
STATE OF MICHIGAN INC., COUNTY OF MACOMB, INC., CITY OF ROSEVILLE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2010cv01680
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Evans
Defendant:
Gonzalez, T. W. Steadman, L. Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
