Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-819
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, UHLER, Superintendent, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Bradshaw v. Annucci
as 24-416
Defendant:
GRAVELL, Mental Health Therapist, Upstate Correctional Facility, R. BARBOSA, CHO, Mid-State Correctional Facility, R. CANTWELL, Commissioner Hearing Officer, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BRADSHAW
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 6:2021cv06604
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Piccolo, Hill, S White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, A. Rodriguez, Uhler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Moore, Mr. Miclteler, Donald Venettozzi and others
Plaintiff:
Demeris Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Piccolo et al
as 6:2020cv06106
Defendant:
C. Clark, Farmer, P. Piccolo and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Piccolo et al
as 9:2020cv00154
Defendant:
C. Clark, Farmer, P. Piccolo and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2019cv01691
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, John Doe, McClary and others
Plaintiff:
Demeris Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavis v. Schroeder
as 16-2793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Chavis
Defendant - Appellee:
H. Kenneth Schroeder, S. Wenderlinch, Lieutenant J. Lamanna and others
Evans v. Oakes
as 14-2138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Evans
Defendant - Appellee:
B. Oakes, Physican Assistant, W. Canfield, Doctor, Peter Bogarski, Health Service Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
