Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Schwartzmiller et al v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Dean A. Schwartzmiller and Christopher Dean Harmon, JR.
Defendant:
K. Rodriguez, John Larson, NBC News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrone Wallace v. Olivarria, et al
as 17-55219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
OLIVARRIA, RJD Appeals Coordinator, B. SELF, RJD Appeals Coordinator, ARMENDARIZ and others
Tyrone Wallace v. Sosa, et al
as 17-55218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOSA, CC II, RJD Appeals Coordinator, B. SELF, CC II, RJD Appeals Coordinator, ROBERT BARTON, I.G. Over CDCR and others
Blackman v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv03072
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
Daniel A. Paramo, P Bracamonte, E. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Paramo et al
as 1:2016cv01875
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, E. Garcia, R. Olivarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Paramo et al
as 2:2016cv02860
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
Daniel A. Paramo, P Bracamonte, E. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raul Arellano v. CDCR, et al
as 16-56797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAUL ARELLANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden, J. RAMIREZ, Appeal Coordinator (CCII) and others
Van Batenburg v. Paramo et al
as 4:2016cv06810
Plaintiff:
William Van Batenburg
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, B. Self, R. Olivarria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nible v. Fink et al
as 3:2016cv02849
Plaintiff:
William L. Nible
Defendant:
Fink , B. Self , T. Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace v. Olivarria et al
as 3:2016cv01808
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Wallace
Defendant:
R. Olivarria, B. Self, R. Armendariz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
