Cases 1 - 10 of 100
HALL v. CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
as 4:2026cv00153
Plaintiff:
REBECCA J. HALL
Defendant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Mammone et al v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 2:2026cv00215
Plaintiff:
Alison Mammone and David Mammone
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Alford v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 1:2026cv00215
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Alford
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP doing business as Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hicks v. Mac's Convenience Stores LLC
as 4:2026cv00035
Plaintiff:
Randy Hicks
Defendant:
Mac's Convenience Stores LLC doing business as Circle K
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hicks v. Mac's Convenience Stores LLC
as 2:2026cv00193
Plaintiff:
Randy Hicks
Defendant:
Mac's Convenience Stores LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PELFREY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
as 4:2026cv00108
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA A. PELFREY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
