Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
4M Fruit Distributors, Inc. et al v. Community Fruitland, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff: 4M Fruit Distributors, Inc. , B.C. Produce, Inc. , Community-Suffolk, Inc. and others
Defendant: Community Fruitland, Inc. , Joseph A. Lombardo, Jr. , Anthony F. Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Manfredi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv11150
Plaintiff: B.C. Produce, Inc. , John Cerasuolo Co., Inc. and State Garden, Inc.
Defendant: Anthony J. Manfredi and Kathleen A. Manfredi
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
B.C. Produce, Inc. v. Gary's Ultimate Fruit, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv11070
Plaintiff: B.C. Produce, Inc.
Defendant: Gary's Ultimate Fruit, Inc., Gary H. Baker and James J. Baker
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Super 88 et al
as 1:2009cv11427
Plaintiff: B.C. Produce, Inc., Community-Suffolk, Inc., Gregg Dziama, Inc. and others
Defendant: Super 88, LLC, Super 88 Market II, Inc., Super 88 Malden, LLC and others
Trustee: United Commercial Bank
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Type: Other Statutes None
J & C Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Dominguez et al
as 1:2008cv11884
Plaintiff: J & C Enterprises, Inc., B.C. Produce, Inc. and State Garden, Inc.
Defendant: Carmen Dominguez, Don Tomas, Inc/ and Tomas Dominguez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Peter Condakes Company, Inc. et al v. Murphy's Fruit, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv11990
Plaintiff: Peter Condakes Company, Inc. and B.C. Produce, Inc.
Defendant: Muprhy's Fruit, Inc., NPL Enterprises, Inc., Nicholas Lembo and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
B.C. Produce, Inc., v. Sirois et al
as 1:2007cv11024
Plaintiff: B.C. Produce, Inc.,
Defendant: Joseph Sirois and Joseph Premium Produce
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?