Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff:
DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
FRANKLIN-MASON v. JOHNSON
as 1:2003cv00945
Plaintiff:
ROXANN J. FRANKLIN-MASON
Defendant:
B.J. PENN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rafiq Bin Alhami v. Barack Obama
as 08-5510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rafiq Bin Bashir B.J. Alhami, detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Mohammed Abdul Rahman, detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station
Defendant - Appellant:
George W. Bush, President of the United States, Barack Obama, President of the United States, Robert M. Gates, Secretary, United States Department of Defense and others
Rafiq Bin Alhami, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 08-5247
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Rafiq Bin Bashir B.J. Alhami, detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station and Mohammed Abdul Rahman, detainee, Guantanamo Bay Naval Station
Defendant - Appellant:
George W. Bush, President of the United States, Barack Obama, President of the United States, Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, United States Department of Defense and others
USA v. Pickett, James
as 03-3018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James Joseph Pickett
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
American Civil Liberties Union of the National Captial Area
Amicus Curiae:
Glen Alonso, Roy C. Anderson, Troy M. Arida and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
